SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI
Barsa – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. L.D. Khatri, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. K. R. Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

Kailash Chandra Joshi, J.—These two criminal revision petitions have been filed against the judgments dated 26.11.1994 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer in Criminal Appeals No. 5/1991 and 4/1991 filed by petitioner Barsa s/o Jumma and Chanesar s/o Janu @ Jasu respectively against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.8.1990 passed against the petitioners by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaisalmer in Criminal Original Case No. 172/1980, whereby the accused/petitioner Barsa was convicted for the offence under Section 13(2) read with Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year alongwith a fine of Rs. 100 and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for one month and accused-petitioner Chanesar was convicted for the offence under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years alongwith a fine of Rs.500 and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo imprisonment for six months.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present revision petitions are that on receiving a secret information, Dy. S.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top