SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.R.GAVAI
Y Kunjappan – Appellant
Versus
Chitralekha Tarachand Anandi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Robert C. Sequeira, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:Ms. Gayatri Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

B.R. Gavai, J.— Though in this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for various reliefs, the petitioner has restricted the claim in the writ petition for quashing the orders passed by the learned JMFC, 49th Court Vikhroli in Case No. 231/N2007 and the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge dated 4th July, 2008 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 299/2008 and for quashing and setting aside the FIR No.170/2007 registered with Borivli Police station and consequent CC No.1326PW2009 pending before the 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai.

2. It was the contention of the respondent No.1 herein that she got acquainted with the present petitioner which turned out into love over affair and they accordingly married on 22nd May, 1999. Even according to respondent No.1 she is Hindu whereas the petitioner is Malyali Christian. According to her marriage was solemnized in Hindu temple according to Hindu Rites and the marriage was also registered on the same day. It was the case of the respondent that on or about 25th May, 1989, the petitioner left the respondent at her mother’s home and had told her that he would later on pick her up. According to respondent, the petitioner did not come to pic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top