SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA
Chandra Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For the Respondent: GA.

JUDGMENT

Bala Krishna Narayana, J.— Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.

This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 27.10.2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly by which he has refused to release the revisionist on bail under proviso Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C.

2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the affidavit filed along with the memo of revision and which are relevant for deciding this revision are that on the basis of a first information report lodged by one Smt. Nemsri w/o Sompal regarding the murder of her husband Sompal by Dharampal, Chandra Pal, Brijpal and Onkar on 12.7.2010 at P.S. Vithari Chainpur, District Bareilly Case Crime No.648 of 2010, under Section 307, 302 IPC was registered against the aforementioned four persons. The revisionist Chandra Pal who is one of the accused in the aforesaid case was arrested on 27.7.2010 and sent to jail on 28.7.2010. Ninty days period stipulated under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for filing of the police report was completed on 26.10.2010 but no charge-sheet was filed. Consequently, an application was moved on behalf of the revisionist before the Chief

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top