SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.MUSAHARY
Altaf Hussain @ Alta Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.H. Rajborbhuyan, Ms. R. Chetri and Mr. L. Das, Advocates.
For the Opp. Party:Mr. B.B. Gogoi, Advocate.

ORDER

P.K. Musahary, J.—Heard Mr. M.H. Rajborbhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam for the opposite party.

2. Orders dated 29.11.2010 and 3.12.2010 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Sessions Case No. 150/2009 are under challenge in this Criminal Revision Petition. How the aforesaid two orders were passed, a brief story of the prosecution needs to be stated.

3. An FIR was lodged against the present petitioner to the effect that on 13.10.2009 at around 8.00 p.m., the petitioner and other accused persons kidnapped the informant’s minor daughter who could not be traced out in spite of search made The police registered the case as Katigoarh P.S. Case No.65/2009 under Sections 366(A)/376, IPC and after investigation charge sheet was laid against the petitioner under Section 366(A)/376, IPC. The case being committed to the learned Court of Sessions, Silchar, was registered as Sessions Case No. 150/2009, and in the meantime, victim girl, got married to somebody at Hailakandi.

4. The learned Sessions Judge framed charge under the said sections against the present accused-petitioner and the trial commenced. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top