SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.T.SANKARAN
Souda Beevi – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Sethunath, Mr. Prakash Kesavan & Mr. P. V. Murugan,
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Manu, PP.

ORDER

K. T. Sankaran, J.—Bail Application Nos.5198 of 2011 and 5358 of 2011 are under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Souda Beevi (accused No.1) and Ahamed (accused No.2) respectively in Crime No.638 of 2007 of Pathanamthitta Police Station. Souda Beevi was arrested on 20.6.2011 and Ahammed was arrested on 25.5.2011. Bail Application No.5620 of 2011 is filed by Souda Beevi, accused No.1 in Crime No.398 of 2011 of Pallickal Police Station, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. She was arrested in that case on 2.7.2011.

2. The offences alleged in Crime No.638 of 2007 of Pathanamthitta Police Station are under Sections 120B, 417, 420, 366, 342, 376(2)(g) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 10 read with Section 24(b)(f)(g) of the Immigration Act, 1983 and Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The allegations levelled against the accused are the following: The de facto complainant (victim) was provided with a visa by the first accused Souda Beevi and the 2nd accused Ahammed, to go to Sharjah on 19.7.2007. The de facto complainant was assured a job in a supermarket at Sharjah. On reaching Sharjah, the victim was illegally detained in a flat and she was compel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top