RITU BAHRI
Balwinder – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ritu Bahri, J.— The present revision petition is against the judgment dated 3.3.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kaithal and judgment dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaithal whereby petitioner was having found to be in possession of primary food article i.e. Ghee for public sale contained in aluminum. Petitioner was convicted under Section 16(g)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000, in default of payment of fine accused was further directed to undergo Crl. Revn No.1067 of 2012 (O&M) 2 simple imprisonment for a period of ten days.
2. Respondent No.2/complainant Government Food Inspector, has filed a complaint against the accused/petitioner on the allegations that the complainant was Govt. Food Inspector appointed vide notification dated 1.4.1994 and on 19.8.2003 at 10 a.m. The complainant inspected the premises of Balwinder Singh accused/petitioner wherein he was found having 20 kgs of Ghee for public sale in aluminum container. A notice was given in writing on Form-VI (Ex. PA) prescribed under the Prevention of Food Adulterat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.