SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RITU BAHRI
Balwinder – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N.L. Sammi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Ritu Bahri, J.— The present revision petition is against the judgment dated 3.3.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kaithal and judgment dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaithal whereby petitioner was having found to be in possession of primary food article i.e. Ghee for public sale contained in aluminum. Petitioner was convicted under Section 16(g)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000, in default of payment of fine accused was further directed to undergo Crl. Revn No.1067 of 2012 (O&M) 2 simple imprisonment for a period of ten days.

2. Respondent No.2/complainant Government Food Inspector, has filed a complaint against the accused/petitioner on the allegations that the complainant was Govt. Food Inspector appointed vide notification dated 1.4.1994 and on 19.8.2003 at 10 a.m. The complainant inspected the premises of Balwinder Singh accused/petitioner wherein he was found having 20 kgs of Ghee for public sale in aluminum container. A notice was given in writing on Form-VI (Ex. PA) prescribed under the Prevention of Food Adulterat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top