SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.BHANGALE
Sheetal Hitesh Thwakar – Appellant
Versus
Hitesh Vijay Thawkar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Applicant:Mr. A.A. Sonak, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Masood Shareef, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

A.P. Bhangale, J.— Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard Mr. A.A. Sonak, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Masood Shareef, Adv. for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 3rd September, 2010 passed in Criminal Appeal No. l77 of 2010 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 7, Nagpur with consequential prayer to restore the order dated l8.6.2010 passed below Ex.16 in Criminal Application No. 541 of 2010 by 20th Joint Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and J.M.F.C. Nagpur. It appears that the present applicant had filed proceedings against her husband and mother-in-law under Section 12 r/w Sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2005”). Alongwith the main application, the applicant had also moved another application for grant of interim relief with averments that the applicant alongwith her husband (respondent No.1) got married on 5th December, 2008 at Nagpur. The applicant had a son by name Sujal who was born on 23.10.2004 at Nagpur and who is residing with her. Sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top