SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(K.S. Radhakrishnan & Dipak Misra, JJ.)
State of Madhya Pradesh — Appellant
versus
Surendra Kori — Respondent
Criminal Appellate Jurisidction Criminal Appeal No…1508………. of 2012 @ S.L.P. (Crl.) No.3149 of 2010 with Crl. A.No.1509 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3150 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1510 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3151 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1511 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3152 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1512 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3153 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1513 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3154 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1514 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3155 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1515 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3156 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1516 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3157 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1517 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3158 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1518 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3160 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1519 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3161 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1520 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3162 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1521 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3163 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1522 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3164 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1523 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3165 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1524 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3168 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1525 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3169 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1526 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.1371 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1527 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3172 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1528 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3173 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1529 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3174 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1530 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3175 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1531 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3176 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1532 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3177 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1533 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3178 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1534 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3179 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1535 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3180 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1536 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3181 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1537 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3182 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1538 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3183 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1539 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3184 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1540 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3185 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1541 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3186 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1542 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3187 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1543 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3188 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1544 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3189 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1545 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3190 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1546 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3191 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1547 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3192 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1548 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3193 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1549 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3194 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1550 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3195 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1551 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3196 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1552 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3198 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1553 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3200 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1554 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3201 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1555 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3202 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1556 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3203 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1557 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3204 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1558 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3205 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1559 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3206 of 2010, Crl. A.No.1560 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3207 of 2010, Crl. A.No.15561 of 2012 @ SLP(Crl) No.3623 of 2010
Decided on : 26-09-2012
(2002) 1 SCC 234; (2005) 13 SCC 540; (2006) 12 SCC 763 – Relied upon
(b) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Offence u/s 34 Registration Act prima facie made out – Matter further involved disputed questions of fact which might cause enquiry to another person in terms of section 44 IPC – Exercise of power u/s 482 not proper.
AIR 1941 PC 16 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
This is an appeal against quashing of FIR u/s 482, Cr.P.C.
Finding of the Court:
High Court ought not have exercised power u/s 482.
Result : Appeals allowed.
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel on either side.
3. We are disposing of all these fifty four appeals by a common order since the identical issues arise for consideration in all these appeals. For the purpose of disposal of these appeals, we may refer to the facts in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3149 of 2010, treating the same as the leading case.
4. The respondent herein, who was functioning as the Deputy Registrar, Khargone, was charge-sheeted for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Sections 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and under Sections 34 and 81 of the Registration Act. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench, in exercise of its powers conferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘CrPC’), quashed the First Information Reports and the charge-sheets filed against the respondent and also quashed the criminal case No. 2500 of 2007 and other connected matters. In order to properly appreciate the correctness or otherwise of the orders passed by the High Court, it is necessary to refer to few facts.
5. State of Madhya Pradesh had introduced a Special Rehabilitation Package (for short ‘Package’) for those persons who were displaced from their lands, submerged while implementing the Sardar Sarovar Project (for short ‘the Project’). As per the Package, for the Project affected persons/oustees, cash benefit in two installments was provided to enable them to purchase land of their choice. The amount would be deposited in bank accounts of the oustees and the first installment would be released when the oustees submits an affidavit intending to purchase land and the second and final installment would be released when both the seller and the purchaser would get their sale deed registered and submit the proof of such registration of sale deed. For availing of the benefit of that Package it was alleged, various fake sale deeds were got registered in the Registrar’s Office at Khargone. Complaints were raised about the manner in which the benefit of the Package was availed of by persons who were not affected by the Project. Narmada Bachao Andolan also filed a complaint before the Narmada Valley Development Authority regarding registration of fake sale deeds for claiming the benefit of the Package.
6. The Collector, District Khargone, vide its letter dated 23.7.2007, directed the Deputy Collector, Khargone to conduct an inquiry and submit a report. The Deputy Collector submitted the report on 11.9.2007. The operative portion of the report reads as follows:
“Because the detailed enquiry of these sale transactions do not seem to be possible without the police action; therefore registering of the Criminal Case and sending this initial enquiry report to the Narmada Valley Development Authority for the proceedings of sentencing the guilty persons after detailed enquiry and getting the case registered for the police action by the land acquisition officer through the Collector of the concerned district are proposed.”
Further, referring to several sale deeds, it was specifically pointed out that some of the vendees and vendors of the documents were fictitious persons and deeds were executed and registered fraudulently.
7. Several FIRs were registered on the complaints filed by the Rehabilitation Officer of the Project, District Khargone before the Kotwali Police Station. In the FIR No.496 dated 18.9.2007 the report of the Deputy Collector dated 11.9.2007 was specifically referred. The operative portion of the FIR reads as follows:
“12. ……….Reference: - received the letter no. 791 dated 11.9.2007 of the Collector, Khargon for necessary action. Regarding the aforesaid subject, it is said that name – displaced (Vendee) Naniya s/o Hariya r/o Gangli has received amount of Rs.3,39,857/- as the special rehabilitation grant after submitting the registration serial no. A- 1/2575 dated 25/3/2006. The additional Collector, Khargon has foun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.