SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Superintendent of Customs – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Younis @ Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:V. Gopala Krishna Gokhale, Advocate.
For the Respondent:D. Suryanarayana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Samudrala Govindarajulu, J.—This is an appeal against acquittal of the accused/respondent recorded by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Session Case No. 511 of 2004 by judgment dated 23.8.2005 finding the accused/respondent not guilty of the charges under Section 21(c), 22(c) and 23(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, the Act). It is the prosecution case that on 27.6.2004, the prosecution agency viz., Customs Air Intelligence Unit intercepted the accused after he completed immigration customs and security checks in Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad while the accused was holding his passport boarding pass and air ticket for boarding into flight No. EK525 to go to Dubai and that officers of Customs Air Intelligence Unit detached baggage slips from boarding pass of the accused and got the baggages unloaded from the air craft and those baggages were identified as his baggages and that baggage of the accused contained Banogesic and Bupringesic injections numbering 9,830 and 11,975 respectively in vial form in them. The officers seized the baggage etc., including the above injection vials under the cover of mediator

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top