SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.S.Satheesachandran
Prem Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S. Rajeev & Mr. K.K. Dheerendrakrishnan, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Rema, PP.

JUDGMENT

S.S. Satheesachandran, J.—Petitioner is the de facto complainant in a crime registered at Town North Police Station, Alappuzha. After investigation of the crime, Ex. P5 report indicting the accused persons named therein for offences punishable under Sections 4, 20,406,409 and 419 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was laid before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Alappuzha by the investigating agency. Petitioner has got serious exception to the report on the ground that some of the accused persons named in his complaint on which the crime was registered, have been left out and also that very many material pieces of evidence connected with the crime are not tendered before the court to sustain the indictment. The learned counsel for the petitioner would also submit that the gravity of the crime imputed in his complaint has been watered down omitting grave offences borne out by the allegations and also the materials gathered by the investigating agency. Petitioner has moved an application before higher Police authority for further investigation of the crime but that has not been considered, is the further grievance espoused for filing this Writ Petition for iss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top