SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Anil Sharma
Jitendra Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Pratip Visoriya, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State:Prabal Solanki, Public Prosecutor, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Anil Sharma, J.— This judgment shall govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 129/2006 and Criminal Appeal No. 140/2006 arising out of a common judgment dated 17.1.2006 passed by learned Special Judge (Dacoity), Datia.

2. These appeals have been filed by the appellants under section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 against a common judgment of conviction and sentence dated 17.1.2006 passed in S.S.T. No. 14/04 by learned Special Judge (Dacoity). Datta whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offence under section 402 of I.P.C. read with section 13 of Madhya Pradesh Dacoity Avam Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam (for brevity M.P.D.V.P.K. Act) and under section 25 (1) (1-b) (a) of Arms Act and they have been sentenced to undergo 3 years RI with fine of Rs.1.000/- and 1 year’s RI with fine of Rs.500/- respectively each with default stipulation.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.3.2004, Station House Officer U.S. Tomar. Police Station Indargarh, District Datia has received an information through informer that some anti-social elements are making preparation of committing dacoity in the house of Ramjisharan. Thereafter, two teams have been form

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top