JUDGMENT

M. Jeyapaul, J.— Plaintiff filed suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the peaceful use and occupation of the plaintiff in House No.334, Sector 9D, Chandigarh, and also for restraining the defendant from obstructing entry of the plaintiff into the premises and exit of the plaintiff from out of the said premises. Plaintiff also filed an interlocutory application seeking interim injunction during the pendency of the suit. Trial Court allowed the application. Lower appellate Court also having concurred with the decision of the trial Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the defendant. Therefore, the defendant has come up with the present revision.

2. Plaintiff has contended that he is the husband of the defendant. It is his further contention that the plaintiff and the defendant are residing in House No.334, Sector 9D, Chandigarh, ever since the date of their wedlock. They have also been blessed with two minor daughters. The suit property was settled by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant by virtue of gift-deed dated 7.5.2005 under threat, intimidation and undue pressure exerted by the defendant upon the plaintiff. It is alleged