SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUJOY PAUL
R. P. Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Shri Prashant Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.1/State:Smt. Sangeeta Pachauri, Deputy Government Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:Shri Vijay Dutt Sharma, Advocate.

R. P. Singh VS State of Madhya Pradesh
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top