JUDGMENT

Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J. — The petitioners, who are practicing Advocates of Udala Bar, have filed this application invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. to quash the order dated 14.2.2003 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Udala in G.R. Case No. 211 of 2000 (T. C. No. 572/2002) rejecting their application for reconsideration of the order of cognizance dated 12.11.2002.

2. The factual matrix of the case in hand is that one Sanatan Patra, is an accused in a criminal case for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 306, 498A/34, IPC. He filed an application for bail, which was rejected by the learned S.D.J.M., Udala. Thereafter, he moved the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj and by order dated 7.9.2000 he was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with one surety. He submitted bail bond in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Udala on 9.8.2000. One Manmath Nayak, son of Jagannath Nayak stood as surety for Sanatan Patra impersonating one Arjun Majhi, son of Late Ananta Majhi. Petitioner No.1, Asit Kumar Behera, an Advocate of Udala Bar, who was engaged as his advocate, furnished bail bond. On 7.9.2000 when he came to know from his Clerk that one Manmath Nayak