SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.JEYAPAUL, ANITA CHAUDHRY
Jatinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. G.B.S. Dhillon. Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. B.S. Bhalla. Additional A. G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

M. Jeyapaul, J.—Accused Jatinder Pal Singh was convicted under Section 302 and was sentenced to undergo RI for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 and in default of payment of fine to undergo further period of RI for 3 months. He was also convicted under Section 364 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000 and in default of payment of fine to undergo further period of RI for 2 months, whereas co-accused Dilsheet Singh and Amar Nath were acquitted of the charges framed as against them. Accused Jatinder Pal Singh has preferred the present appeal aggrieved by the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that Harmeet Kaur, daughter of complainant Gurcharan Singh (PW1) left the house on 23.12.1998 at about 8.45 a.m. to attend a course in ITI, Nangal Township. PW1 received a telephonic call on 23. 12.1998 at about 11.30 p.m. from an unidentified person that Harmeet Kaur was admitted to Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh in an unconscious condition. He came to know that his daughter was kidnapped by accused Jatinder Pal Singh along with his companions when she was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top