JUDGMENT

Arvind Kumar Tripathi, J. —Heard Mohd. Arif Khan, learned Counsel for the revisionist. Sri D.C. Mukherjee, learned Counsel for respondent and Sri Rizwan Kamal, learned AGA for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been filed by Smt. Binda Devi challenging the judgment dated 22.12.2000 passed by Special Judge (S.C. and S.T. Act), Unnao by which revision filed against order dated 30.8.2000 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Safipur, Unnao under Sections 145/146 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code for attachment of property in dispute, was dismissed.

3. As per factual matrix of the case, a proceeding under Section 145(1) was initiated on a report of Inspector-in-charge Kotwali Safipur dated 28.10.1998 by which it was alleged that Smt. Binda Devi was married in village Deogaon Pargana, Tehsil Safipur, District-Unnao. But unfortunately she became widow. Agricultural property of Binda Devi’s husband is in possession of Vimal Chandra, while name of Binda Devi is entered in revenue record. Several cases are pending between the parties but no final decision has yet been given in any case. There is dispute regarding reaping and sowing of crops. On this report, notice was issued to t