SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Haripada Parui – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:Milon Mukherjee, Biswajit Manna, Meenal Sinha, Advocates.
For the State:Sabyasachi Banerjee, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Joymalya Bagchi, J. —The appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 22nd/23rd December, 2009 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-11, Uluberia, Howrah convicting the appellants for commission of offence punishable under Section 304B/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing appellant no.1 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of a sum of Rs.500/-in default to suffer simple imprisonment of 1 month under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and other appellants to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal

2. Code and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 1 month for the offence punishable under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, both the sentences to run concurrently.

3. Prosecution case, as alleged, against the appellants is as follows:

4. One Neoti Maity(PW1) lodged complaint before Shyampur Police Station alleging that his daughter, Prat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top