M.L.TAHALIYANI
Rajesh Gevarchand Luniya – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.L. Tahaliyani, J.—The applicant is facing trial for offence punishable under Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code, in the Court of Sessions at Pune vide Session Case Nos.27 of 2014 and 26 of 2014, respectively.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant should not have been charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 413 of the IPC, for allegedly habitually receiving stolen property unless he is convicted for the offence under Section 411 of IPC. Habitual Offender under The Bombay Habitual Offenders Act, 1959 is defined as under :
“2(e) “habitual offender” means any person who, since his attaining the age of eighteen years;
(i) during any consecutive period (whether before or after the commencement of this Act, or partly before and partly after such commencement) of five years, has been sentenced on conviction on not less than three occasions, to a substantive term of imprisonment for one or more of the scheduled offences committed on separate occasions, being offences, which are not so connected together as to form parts of the same transaction, and
(ii) such sentence has not been reversed in appeal or revision;
Provided that in computin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.