SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.RAMAKRISHNAN
T. S. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Manzoor – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr.Shaji P.Chaly, Mr.R.Sanjith, Smt.C.S.Sindhu Krishnah & Mr.M.Shino, Advocates
For the Respondents: PP, Smt.Seena Ramakrishnan

ORDER

K.Ramakrishnan, J.—Complainant in CC.No.572/2013 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kochi, is the revision petitioner herein.

2. The revision petitioner herein filed a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (herein after called the Act) before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kochi, against the first respondent herein alleging offences under section 138 of the Act, on the basis of a cheque given by the first respondent drawn on Federal Bank, Thenhipalam branch, Kozhikode in favour of the complainant on the basis of a law prevailing at that time and on the basis of the decision of the Apex Court, the case was taken on file by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Kochi. Thereafter, on the basis of the decision of the Apex Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod V. State of Maharashtra and Another, 2014 (3) Crimes 162 (SC): 2014 (5) Supreme 641: 2014(7) SC 273: 2014(3) CCC 164: 2014 (3) KHC 362. wherein the Supreme Court has held that the court within whose jurisdiction the drawee bank is situated alone will get jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under section 138 of the Act and also directed the Magistrate to return

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top