SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Nirmal Khandelwal – Appellant
Versus
Terai Dooars Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Devi Priya Mitra, Advocate.
For the O.P. No.1:Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya. Advocate.

ORDER

Joymalya Bagchi, J.—Order dated 24.09.2013 passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court at Calcutta affirming the order dated 29.07.2013 passed by the learned 17th Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta in Complaint Case No. 18808 of 2007 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 has been assailed in this revision petition.

2. The petitioner is facing prosecution of commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.

3. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner resides out of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate and the learned Magistrate failed and neglected to comply with the mandatory requirement under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure at the time of issuance of process. Decision of Apex Court in National Bank of Oman Vs. Barakara Abdul Aziz & Anr. (2013) 1 CCr. LR (SC) 585 is relied upon in support of such contention.

4. Ms. Mitra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the learned Courts below erred in law in failing to appreciate that non-compliance of mandatory provision of Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure renders the consequential

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top