SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ABHILASHA KUMARI
Yama – Appellant
Versus
Ankit Manubhai Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner No.1:Ms. Trusha K. Patel, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Dipak Patel For Mr. J.C. Vyas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Smt. Abhilasha Kumari, J.—Rule. Mr.Dipak Patel, learned advocate, waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and decided finally.

2. The challenge in this petition, preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is to the order dated 10.4.2014, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.2, Ahmedabad (“the Family Court” for short), below the application at Ex.5, preferred by the respondent-husband in Family Suit No.1555 of 2013, whereby the ex-parte order of status quo granted in favour of the respondent on 15.11.2013, has been confirmed, with certain conditions.

3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner herein is the legally-wedded wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 30.4.2006 and out of the wedlock, a daughter, named, Henisha was born on 15.7.2007. Thereafter, on 15.11.2010, the petitioner gave birth to another daughter, named, Shanaya. According to the petitioner, after the birth of the second daughter, the respondent and his family membe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top