SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Rafiuddin Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Sadu Rajeshwar Reddy, Advocate
For the Respondents: Asst. Public Prosecutor

ORDER

U.Durga Prasad Rao, J.—In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners/A1 to A3 seek to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.342 of 2010 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. A1 is the husband of de facto complainant. A2 and A3 are parents of A1.

3. The private complaint filed by de facto complainant on 13.7.2009 was forwarded by learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad to the Women P.S Charminar South Zone, Hyderabad, which was registered as Crime No.172/2009 for the offences under Section 498A r/w 34 IPC and after investigation charge sheet was laid against A1 to A3 and the learned XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad took cognizance of the case and registered as C.C.No.342 of 2010.

4. The prosecution case is that the marriage between A1 and the defacto complainant took place on 10.12.2004. A1 was doing Air Ticketing Job in K.S.A (Kingdom Saudi Arabia). The parents of complainant presented Rs.1,00,000 cash as dowry, 8 Tolas of Gold ornaments and huge Jahez Articles including Electronic Gadgets at the time of marriage and the Accused gave 15 Tolas of Gold ornaments to t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top