SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

U.V.BAKRE
Shradha Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Adhithri Trading Company – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar and Ms. Tanvi Kamat Ghanekar, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate

JUDGMENT

U.V. Bakre, J.—This revision application is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II Margao, (“Appellate Court”, for short) in Criminal Appeal No. 61/2013.

2. The said Criminal Appeal No. 61/2013 was, in turn, filed against the judgment, order and sentence dated 17.4.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, ‘B’ Court Vasco (‘J.M.F.C.’, for short) in Criminal Case No. 113/OA/NIA/2011/B. Applicant was the complainant whereas respondents were the accused in the said Criminal Case. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status in the said Criminal Case.

3. The complainant had filed a complaint against the accused persons for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘N. I. Act’, for short) which gave rise to the said Criminal Case. The case of the complainant, in short, was as follows:

Complainant was a company engaged in the business of operating barges for transportation of mineral ore and it also gave its barges on hire to interested operators. The accused No. 2 was engaged in the business of transportation of mineral ore and car

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top