JUDGMENT

G. Chandraiah, J.—The accused are A1 to A14. A1 to A9 were charged for the offence punishable under Sections 366, 376(2)(g), 294(b), 292 IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. A10 was charged for the offence punishable under Sections 366, 376 (2)(g) read with 109 of IPC and A11 to A14 were charged for the offence punishable under Sections 66 and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. The trial court -II Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Khammam, in S.C.No.483 of 2009, by judgment dated 15.4.2010, found A1 to A9 guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 366, 376(2)(g) and 292 IPC and Section 66 of the information Technology Act, 2000. For the offence punishable under Section 366 I.P.C., A1 to A9 were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000 and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month each. For the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC, A1 to A9 were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000 and in default to suffer imprisonment for a period of two months reach,