SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANOJ MISRA
Anar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicants:D.K. Tiwari, Advocate
For the Opp.Party:Govt. Advocate, M.C. Chaturvedi

JUDGMENT

Manoj Misra, J.—Heard Sri B.N. Rai, who has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants; Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, who appears on behalf of the informant; and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant application has been filed challenging an order dated 28.02.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai by which the learned Magistrate at the time of taking cognizance on the police report with reference to case crime no. 1356 of 2014, P.S. Nadigaon, District Jalaun, after taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 304 I.P.C., has proceeded to summon the applicants who though were named in the first information report but not sent for trial by the police.

3. The facts, in brief, as they appear on record, are that a first information report was lodged against as many as seven persons namely, Anar Singh (applicant no.1); Ranveer Singh (applicant no.2); Shanker Singh; Ashok; Mangal Singh; Sunil; and Narendra. The allegation in the FIR (Annexure 1 to the application) was to the effect that in the morning of 23.11.2014 when the informant (Vinod Kumar) was travelling form Gopalpura to his village Nadigaon, near village Para

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top