SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.N.DESHMUKH
Narendra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Anil S. Mardikar, Senior Advocate
For the Respondent/State: Mr. N.R.Rode, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

P.N.Deshmukh, J.—This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 31st of July, 2007 passed by Judge, Special Court (ACB), Nagpur in Special Case No.22 of 1998, by which appellant came to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/, in default to suffer R.I. for three months. Appellant is further convicted for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.

2. Prosecution case can briefly be stated as follows -

Appellant/ accused on the date of incident was working as Junior Clerk, attached to the court of Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Katol, Distt.Nagpur. Complainant Faridshah Makbulshah was having two criminal cases under the Prohibition Act being Prohibition Case Nos.197 of 1997 and 1452 of 1996 pending before the said Court. Appellant admittedly being Clerk attached to the Court of Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Katol was looking af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top