SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIPIN SANGHI
Sonu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. S.K. Duggal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.09.2008, in SC No. 73/2006, arising out of F.I.R. No. 885/05, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, convicting the Appellants for the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), and the order on sentence dated 20.09.2008 whereby – for the offence under Section 498A, IPC, the appellants Sonu Kumar (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellant No.1’), Ashok Kumar (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellant No.2’) and Suraj (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellant No.3’) were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (‘RI’) for a period of two and a half years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo Simple Imprisonment (‘SI’) for period of four months.

2. The facts taken note of in the impugned judgment are that on 27.12.2005 a report was lodged with the police vide DD No. 50A. Consequently, SI Johnny Anto (PW-12) along with constable Hoshiyar Singh went to the spot at H. No. B-83 Shiv Puri II, Dinpur, Najafgarh, Delhi where they found deceased Seema, wife of Sonu (appellant no.1) lying dead. Police came to know that elder brother of the husband of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top