SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
S.K. Gangele and S.K. Palo, JJ.
Sambhagiye Nagrik Upbhokta —Petitioner
versus
Union of India & Ors. —Respondents
W.P. No.7677 of 2012 (PIL)
Decided on 1.10.2014

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.B.S. Tomar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Ms. Vivek Khedkar, Dy. Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
State Government not taken care to appoint persons,who having qualification in accordance with Rules of 2011,authorities cannot play with health of citizens.

Headnote:Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Section 2(h), (j), (m), (p) & 91 read with 5, 7, 30, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 47, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 81, 82, 83 & 84 — Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011 — Rule 2.1.2 (iii) (b) & Rule 2.1.4 —State Government not taken care to appoint persons — Who having qualification in accordance with Rules of 2011 —Who working as Food Analyst sent on deputation — He could not be said to have qualification of Food Analyst and experience of work in State Laboratory — HELD — Authorities cannot play with health of citizens — In view writ petition disposed of with following directions: (i) State Government directed to appoint Designated Officer in accordance with provisions of the Act — (ii) Union of India directed to provide financial assistance to State Government for establishment of Food Laboratory and up-gradation of Food Laboratories in accordance with law, so existing food laboratories may be accredited by National Accreditation Board — (iii) Union of India directed to make financial assistance available to State for establishment of 10 DFL — (iv) State Government directed to follow and implement provisions of the Act and rules — (v) These directions be followed and complied with within period of six months from date of receipt of copy of order — (vi) Respondent shall file compliance report in this regard before Principal Registrar of this court. (Paras 19 & 20)

       Result: Petition disposed of.

       

ORDER

S.K. Gangele, J.—This PIL has been filed by an organisation named as Sambhagiye Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshan Manch.

2. The petitioner prayed for a relief that the State Government be directed to comply the provisions of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (hereinafter called as ‘Act of 2006’) and the rules made thereunder. The State Government shall appoint Designated Officer, Food Commissioner and Food Analyst in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 2006 and the rules made thereunder. The Food Laboratory established in the State of Madhya Pradesh be notified in accordance with law.

3. Union of India enacted the Act of 2006. The President of India granted assent to the Act on 25th August 2006. Subsequently certain provisions came into force in the year 2008, 2009 and 2010. The object of the Act is to consolidate the laws relating to food and to establish the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India for laying down science based standards for articles of food and to regulate their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and import, to ensure availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act is in regard to providing food and regulation of distribution, manufacture and sale of food, hence, it is an important piece of legislation because it affects the life of citizens. Section 2(h) of the Act of 2006 defines “Designated Officer”, which means the officer appointed under section 36. Similarly, Section 2(j) of the Act of 2006 defines “Food Analyst” which means an analyst appointed under Section 45 and Section 2 (m) of the Act of 2006 defines “Food Authority”, which means the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India established under Section 4. Section 2 (p) defines “food laboratory”, which is as under:

“food laboratory” means any food laboratory or institute established by the Central or a State Government or any other agency and accredited by National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or an equivalent accreditation agency recognised by the Food Authority under Section 43.”

Similarly, “Food Safety Officer” means an officer appointed under Section 37.

4. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that up till now proper Food Analyst, Food Authority, Food Safety Officer and Designated Officer have not been appointed. The State is playing with the health of the citizens.

5. The Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 91 of the Act of 2006 read with Sections 5, 7, 30, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 47, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 81, 82, 83 and 84 enacted the rules named as the Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011 (hereinafter referred to the Rules of 2011). In accordance with the Rule 2.1.2 (iii) (b) of the Rules of 2011 at the time of commencement of these rules, the post of Designated Officer is held by any other officer of equivalent rank. Rule 2.1.4 of the Rules of 2011 prescribes qualification of Food Analyst.

6. The petitioner pleaded in the petition that there is only one Food Laboratory for analysis of food samples at Bhopal, but the aforesaid laboratory has not been notified by the Food Authority or it has not been accredited by any NABT, which is mandatory in accordance with Section 43(1) of the Act of 2006 and Section 4 of the Act.

7. The petitioner further pleaded that the Food Analyst has also not been appointed in accordance with the provisions of Rules of 2011. One person Mr. Meena was posted on deputation as Food Analyst for a period of one year, thereafter the period was extended, however, he can not work as Food Analyst in the State Government Laboratory, even though the deputation period of Mr.Meena was extended. Similarly the State Government has not appointed Commissioner of Food Safety in accordance with the qualification of Rules of 2011. Mrs. M. Geeta, who is working as Commissioner of Food Safety, was not the officer of the rank of Commissioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top