SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.PUJAHARI
Biswajit Mahakud – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:M/s. Dillip Ray, Smita Das, K.B. Mishra, S.P.Mishra, Advocates
For the Opp.Party:Sangram Keshari Nayak, Advocate

ORDER

S. Pujahari, J.—Heard.

2. This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 09.02.2015 passed by the learned C.J.M.-cum- Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bhadrak in J.G.R. Case No.4 of 2015 which has been confirmed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Bhadrak vide order dated 23.02.2015 passed in Crl. Appeal No.3 of 2015 with prayer to quash the same.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned C.J.M.-cum-Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bhadrak passed the impugned order refusing to release the petitioner on bail without showing any reasons that in what manner the release of the juvenile shall defeat the ends of justice. There is also no material whatsoever before the trial court disclosing the fact that the release of the juvenile shall defeat the ends of justice in any manner and his release shall bring him into the association with known criminals and expose him to moral, physical and psychological danger. The learned Sessions Judge also oblivious to the same, having confirmed the order, the same cannot be sustained. Hence, he submits to allow this criminal revision and direct to release the petitioner on bail.

4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top