SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Veena Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate
For the Respondents: Smt. Nivedita Nirvikar, G.P-10

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.—By the present writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Veena Devi seeks quashing of the order dated 6.6.2014, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai, in Bhagwanpur P. S. Case No. 49 of 2014, whereby a warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner.

2. The relevant facts of case are as under:-

(a) One Narendra Thakur lodged a report with Bhagwanpur Police Station on 7.3.2014 that on 6.3.2014 at about 6 p.m., his niece Rani Kumari, aged about 8 years, had gone outside the house to play but did not return.

(b) On the basis of the aforesaid information, a missing person report was entered in the station diary of the Police Station on 7.3.2014. As the victim could not be located, the informant suspected that some unknown criminal might have kidnapped her.

(c) Accordingly, on the basis of a written report, dated 8.3.2014, submitted by Narendra Thakur, Bhagwanpur P. S. Case No. 49 of 2014, was registered under Sections 364 and 372/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) against unknown and investigation was taken up.

(d) In course of investigation, the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top