SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.R.UDHWANI
Sibtehussain Gulame Abbas – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr MM Tirmizi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms Moxa Thakker, APP

JUDGMENT (COMMON ORAL)

G.R.Udhwani, J.—Aggrieved by the judgment and order passed in Criminal Appeal No.18/1999 confirming the judgment and order passed in Criminal Case No.1887/1991 convicting and sentencing the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 9(1), 39(1), 51, 52 and 54(3) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 (for short “the Act”), the petitioners are before this Court.

2. Petitioner-Mohammed Hasan Fulame Rasul was the original accused no.1 and petitioner-Sibtehussain Gulam E. Abbas was the original accused no.2 (hereinafter referred to as “accused nos.1 and 2”, respectively).

3. As per the prosecution case, accused nos.1 and 2 committed the offence in question on 17.01.1989 in the evening in the jungles of Dhareswar Village. A black deer is alleged to have been gunned down by the accused persons. Forest Guard-Bhagwanbhai Rambhai and Beat Guard-Rukhadbhai Gorakbhai approached the scene of offence on hearing the gunshot and found both the accused standing near the deer which, according to the witness still had some life. Accused no.2 was found with licenced gun accompanied by accused no.1. It is the prosecution case that witness-Rukhad suspected the accuse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top