SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHEEL NAGU
Deepti Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Shweta Parmar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Shri Rajmani Bansal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Ankur Mody, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sheel Nagu, J.—Inherent powers of this court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. are invoked for assailing the order dated 8/2/2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gwalior in complaint case No.1254/13 for taking cognizance of the complaint alleging offence punishable under Section 384 of I.P.C., and thereby issuing summons to the petitioners. Pertinently, petitioner No.1 is Smt. Dipti Gupta, who is said to be friend of Dr. Subhash Parmar, husband of respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.

3. Factual matrix giving rise to the present dispute is that on 21/6/2010 the respondent and Dr. Subhash Parmar entered into wedlock whereafter both started residing in matrimonial home at Bhopal but later from August, 2010 to May, 2010 they shifted to Gwalior. The respondent alleged that she was subjected to curelty for dowry demand. It was further alleged that in connivance with one Dr. Dipti Gupta (petitioner No.1), who is alleged to be friend of husband Dr. Subhash Parmar, the respondent/wife was surreptitiously given drugs so that she may abort the unborn child, who was diagnosed by sonography to be of female sex. It was alleged that in this nefarious

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top