SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SURESH KAIT
Seema Seth – Appellant
Versus
Nishits Seth – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sunil Mittal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Nemo.

JUDGMENT

Crl. M.A. No. 15535/2015 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

Crl. M.C. No.. 4387/2015

Suresh Kait, J.—Vide the instant petition under Section 482 Cr P C, 1973 petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the order dated 21.09.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, in Criminal Appeal No.16/2015 preferred by respondent.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) wherein the interim maintenance was granted under Section 20/23 of the Act vide order dated 06.06.2015 by learned Trial Court and directed the respondent to pay a composite amount of Rs.40,000/- per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing of the petition. It is further directed that the amount shall include all the incidental expenses such as maintenance charges etc. The petitioner filed the above noted petition on 17.01.2013 and total amount due on account of maintenance till the date of the passing of the impugned order was more than Rs.12.00 Lac. The respondent had filed before the Tria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top