SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANDEEP MEHTA
Devilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. DL Rawla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, PP.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J.—The instant second application for bail has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.38/2016, Police Station Sangariya, District Hanumangarh, for the offences under Sections 8/21, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Sections 8C/27B(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

2. The first bail application submitted on behalf of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 24.2.2016 while investigation was still pending. Now post filing of chargesheet, this second bail application has been moved.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that medicinal preparations were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and thus, he can only be prosecuted under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act. He relied upon the order dated 16.9.2015 passed by the Hon’ble Single Bench of this Court in a bunch of bail applications led by S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7976/2015 (Mahesh. vs. State of Rajasthan) wherein, dealing with a case involving similar recovery, the Hon’ble Single Bench of this Court held that Drugs and Cosmetics Act is competent and self sufficient Statute for dealing with the cases

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top