SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, R.B.BUDIHAL
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Sri P.M. Nawaz, SPP-1

JUDGMENT

Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J.—The judgment and order of acquittal passed by the II Additional CMM Court, Bangalore dated 22.1.2015 passed in C.C.No.23501/2015 is impugned in this Criminal Appeal filed by the State.

2. The accused were tried and acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 326, 427 read with Section 34 of IPC. It is not in dispute that the offence punishable under Section 326 is cognizable and non-bailable. Hence, it is clear that the Court below has tried the matter involving cognizable and non-bailable offence apart from other offences and has acquitted the accused by the impugned judgment and order.

3. Section 378(1)(a) and (b) of Cr.P.C., 1973 reads thus:

“378. Appeal in case of acquittal.–[(1) Save as otherwise provided in sub- section (2), and subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (5), -

(a) the District Magistrate may, in any case, direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the Court of Session from an order of acquittal passed by a Magistrate in respect of a cognizable and non-bailable offence;

(b) the State Government may, in any case, direct the Public Prosecutor to present an appeal to the High Court from an o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top