SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.BHARATHIDASAN
Sundar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. A.V. Arun, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Maharaja, APP

JUDGMENT

S. Nagamuthu, J.—The appellant, the sole accused in S.C.No.124 of 2011 on the file of the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Ponneri, Thiruvallur District, has come up with this criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court under Section 302 of IPC to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months by judgment dated 24.01.2014.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mr.Ayyakannu. Mr.Ayyakannu was a building contractor. He used to engage the accused to transport the building materials to the work spot in the cart owned by the accused for hire. After some time, the deceased declined to hire the bullock-cart belonging to the accused. The accused was enraged over the same.

3. On 06.05.2008 at about 01.00 p.m., it is alleged that near the shed belonging to the deceased there was a quarrel between the accused and the deceased on account of the above dispute. During the quarrel, it is alleged that the accused kicked the deceased and pushed him down. After the deceased had fallen, it is alleged that, the accused dropp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top