SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.SUBBIAH
State – Appellant
Versus
Manoharan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. P. Govindarajan, APP
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Haroon-AL-Rasheed for
M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co.

JUDGMENT

R. Subbiah, J.—This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment of acquittal of the respondent/accused in Special Case No.1 of 2006, dated 09.06.2014 on the file of the Special-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court, Vellore. The respondent/accused has been acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. in respect of the charges framed against him for the alleged offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2. Before going into the details of the evidence, the brief case of the prosecution is stated hereunder:

The respondent/accused was working as Junior Engineer in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tharapadavedu, Katpadi, Vellore District. The de-facto complainat (who was examined as P.W.2 before the trial Court) initially approached the respondent/accused on 25.05.2005 seeking electricity service connection for his shopping complex, by submitting an application with fees of Rs. 50/-, for which, receipt was also issued. Subsequently, again on 27.05.2015, the de-facto complainant approached the accused for the same request, for which, the respondent/accused demanded an illegal gratification of Rs. 500/-. Hence, the de-fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top