SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Rajat Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ruchi Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. R.K. Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Mathur, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT (CAV)

Pankaj Bhandari, J.—Petitioner has preferred separate revision petitions bearing Criminal Revision No.1212/2016 against the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Alwar (Raj.) whereby, the appeal filed by the respondent has been partly allowed and the amount of compensation has been enhanced from Rs.30,000/- to 40,000/- per month and rent has been enhanced from Rs.5,000/- to 10,000/- per month and against the order dated 27.01.2015, whereby the application for interim maintenance has been allowed and Rs.30,000/- has been awarded as interim maintenance to the respondent and Rs.5,000/- has been awarded as rent.

2. The factual matrix of the case are that an application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was filed by the respondent.

3. The Court below considering the entire material on record awarded Rs.30,000/- per month as interim maintenance and Rs.5,000/- per month as house rent to the respondent.

4. An appeal was preferred by the petitioner as well as respondent against said order dated 27.01.2015. The appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected but the appeal preferred by the respondent was all

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top