SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JANAK RAJ KOTWAL
Tanveer Iqbal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rohit Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Chopra, GA.

JUDGMENT

Janak Raj Kotwal, J.—Petitioner invokes inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 561-A Cr. P. C. to seek quashing of FIR No. 01 of 2018 of Police Station, Manjakote (Distt. Rajouri) under Section 376 RPC registered against him on a complaint filed by respondent No.3 (hereinafter to be referred as the prosecutrix).

2. The prosecutrix filed complaint in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajouri. She alleged that the petitioner, who hails from her village, was well acquainted with her. He developed relation with her 4/5 years back in the year 2013 and said that he will marry her. He remained in constant telephonic touch with her and had been committing sexual intercourse with her under the pretext that he will marry her. He used to make her reject all other offers of marriage received by her. The petitioner, however, has now refused to marry her and has thereby spoiled her life. She thus alleges that the petitioner has committed heinous offence on her continuously for 4/5 years under the pretext of marrying her. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, as is evident from the impugned FIR, forwarded the complaint to SHO, Police Station, Manjakote for “action under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top