SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.MUDAGAL
Prakasha K – Appellant
Versus
State by Kalasa Police Station – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Vinayaka V.S. Advocate
For the Respondent: Chetan Desai, HCGP

JUDGMENT

K.S. Mudagal, J.—This appeal of the accused arises out of the order of conviction and sentence passed by the 1st Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru in Special Case (PCSOA) No.7/2014 on 05.08.2015.

2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 354, 504, 506 of I.P.C, Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act’) and Section 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC/ST Act’).

3. On 27.06.2016 this court admitted the appeal. Lower Court Records are received.

4. Heard both side.

5. Kalasa Police charge sheeted the appellant in Crime No.24/2014 of their Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 354, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on the basis of complaint Ex.P.1 filed by P.W.1-Vanaja wife of Raju.

6. Gist of the complaint is as follows:

On 02.03.2014 at 8.30 a.m. w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top