SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
State – Appellant
Versus
Arjun Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. Ehsan Mirza, Dy. AG
For the Respondent:Mr. Rohan Nanda, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J.—State is aggrieved of the acquittal earned by Arjun Singh S/o Paras Ram R/o Smailpur, Tehsil & District Samba ( for brevity ‘accused’) vide impugned judgment dated 30.09.2014 of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kathua in case FIR No.138/2011 registered in Police Station Bari Brahmana for the offence under Section 376 RPC, therefore, Cr. Acq. Appeal No.21/2005.

2. As per the prosecution, on 15.10.2011 one Vinod Kumar S/o Ram Kirpal R/o Smailpur, Tehsil and District Samba along with his wife lodged an oral complaint with Police Station Bari Brahmana alleging therein that on that day at about 5.30 a.m., his wife had gone out to defecate in the nearby bushes, where Arjun Singh S/o Paras Ram R/o Smailpur, Tehsil & District Samba was hidden, who caught hold of his wife and forcibly committed rape on her and also forcibly snatched away her ear rings. She returned home weeping and narrated about the entire incident to him. He told about the incident to the Sarpanch and other respectable of the village. Upon this oral complaint a case FIR No.138/2011 under Sections 376/382 RPC registered and investigation commenced. During the course of investigation, visite

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top