SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Dharam Chand Chaudhary and Vivek Singh Thakur, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh -Appellant
versus
Om Parkash -Respondent
Cr. Appeal No.166 of 2011
Decided on 14.3.2018

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. D.S. Nainta & Mr. Virender Verma, Additional Advocate Generals
For the Respondent:Mr. Vipin Rajta, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Stringent the punishment, stricter the degree of proof required, since higher degree of assurance is required to convict the accused.

Headnote:(i) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 20—Recovery of 4kg 400 grams of charas from a bag found placed underneath the seat in the bus and accused was setting on that seat while travelling in bus—Acquittal of accused by trial court—State appeal—Spot witnesses police officials who had intercepted bus during routine checking of vehicles and one independent witness also travelling in bus by a large corroborated prosecution case—Though conductor of bus turned hostile but he admitted recovery of charas from bag and admitted his signatures on memos—Question was whether the bag containing charas was in conscious possession of accused—Bag was lying underneath three seater bench bearing seat No.12, 13 and 14 and accused was setting on seat No. 14—Independent witness PW2 joined by police was occupant of seat No.16—No plausible reason for not having cited or examined passengers occupying seats 12 and 13—Discrepancy in timings as to when police party reached police station after completing its proceedings on spot—Evidence failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it was only respondent who was in possession of bag which contained contraband—Acquittal was not to be interfered with. (Paras 23 to 33)

       (ii) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Charas—Charas is a serious mass and presence of resin in the stuff analysed without there being evidence que nature of neutral substance entire mass has to be taken as charas. (Paras 34)

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.—Instant appeal has been preferred by the State of Himachal Pradesh against acquittal of respondentOm Parkash vide judgment, dated 14th January, 2011, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Solan, in Case No. 11 FTC/7 of 2010 arising out of case FIR No. 98/2009 registered at Police Station Parwanoo, District Solan, under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NDPS Act’).

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 28th November, 2009, after recording G.D. Entry No. 34 (a), Ex. PW4/A, PW12 ASI Ram Lal alongwith PW1 HC Ashok Kumar, PW7 HC Bhagirath, PW11 Constable Rajesh Kumar and Constable Gurcharjit Singh (not examined) left the Police Station at about 11.10 p.m. in official vehicle Bolero Camper being driven by Constable Desh Raj (not examined) having search light, investigation kit and weights and scale for checking of vehicles and Nakkabandi in the area of Sector 3, Parwanoo etc. At about 12.35 a.m., police party stopped a HRTC bus plying from Rohru to Delhi near Shivalic Agro Factory, Sector 3, Parwanoo and conducted routine checking of luggage of passengers. During checking, a person sitting on seat No. 14 was found with a bag in his lap and one bag between his legs below the seat. On checking these bags, a mobile charger with lead and a tshirt were found in the bag which was in his lap and in another bag, a brown pant, a woolen shawl and a polythene packet were found. In the polythene packet, charas in round and stick shape was recovered. Person alongwith bags was brought out of the bus from the front door and driver and conductor of the bus were also called outside the bus, who disclosed their names to be Vinod Kumar and Nagender, respectively. Name of owner of bag was also asked in presence of driver and conductor of the bus, who disclosed his name and identity as respondent.

4. Thereafter, identification slip of recovered contraband Ex. PW1/A was prepared and on weighing, recovered charas was found to be 4 kg 400 grams. Recovered charas was put in the polythene bag and was again put in bag alongwith shawl and the bag was sealed in a packet of cloth by affixing seal ‘A’. Another bag was also sealed in a separate piece of cloth with the same seal ‘A’. Sample of seal was taken and it was handed over to PW7 HC Bhagirath. Memo Ex. PW1/C was prepared in this regard. Parcels were taken into possession vide property search and seizure form Ex. PW1/D and Ex. PW1/E. NCB form in triplicate was filled in. During the search and seizure process, PW1 HC Ashok Kumar had also taken photographs of the proceedings with digital camera, which were downloaded by PW10 ASI Chander Shekhar on the computer for taking prints Ex. P10 to P12 of the said photographs.

5. After seizure of the contraband, rukka Ex. PW12/B was sent to Police Station at 2.10 a.m. through PW11 Constable Rajesh Kumar, who handed over the same to PW4 MHC Prem Singh, which was fed in the computer by the said MHC and FIR Ex. PW4/B was registered, which was signed by PW9 SHO Govind Ram. After registration of FIR, PW11 Constable Rajesh Kumar brought the case file to the spot. PW12 ASI Ram Lal completed the proceedings on the spot. During this process, respondent also produced bus tickets from Karsog to Shimla worth Rs.90/Ex. P1 and from Shimla to Samlakha worth Rs.200/Ex. P2, vide memo Ex. PW1/F. Spot map Ex PW12/C was prepared. Statements of witnesses were recorded and respondent was arrested at 5.30 a.m. after giving information of his arrest to him and his father. Memo Ex. PW12/D was prepared in this regard.

6. As per prosecution case, police party returned to Police Station at 7.40 a.m. and produced the case property before PW9 SHO Govind Ram, who resealed the recovered contraband with seal ‘G’. After taking sample of seal ‘G’ on the piece of cloth, filling up relevant column in NCB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top