SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
Rajshekhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Sri. Santosh B. Mane, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri. Raja Raghavendra Naik, HCGP

ORDER

Mohammad Nawaz, J.—This petition is filed by the petitioners praying to set aside the condition No.2 imposed in the order dated 27.01.2018 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad sitting at Hubballi, in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 of 2018, while the petitioners were enlarged on bail in Crime No.174 of 2017 of APMC Navanagar Police Station, Hubballi registered for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 420 read with Section 34 of IPC.

2. I have heard Sri. Santosh B. Mane, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri. Raja Raghavendra Naik, the learned HCGP appearing for the respondent-State.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the learned Sessions Judge while releasing the petitioners on anticipatory bail has directed them to offer cash security of Rs.1,00,000/- each and he submits that virtually it amounts to denial of bail to the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners are ready and willing to comply with all other conditions. Hence prays that the condition No.2 imposed by the learned Sessions Judge may kindly be relaxed.

4. The learned HCGP submits that, considering the nature of allegations made a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top