AJAI LAMBA, RAJEEV SINGH
Parvati Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru. Prin Secy Home – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
The petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing First Information Report No.033 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366 and 352 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sujauli, District Bahraich.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri S.P. Singh learned counsel for the State, and Shri Shiv P. Shukla, learned counsel who has given assistance to the Court on behalf of respondent no.5/Unique Identification Authority of India, New Delhi (for short “UIDAI”).
In deciding a related issue as to ‘‘of what facts Aadhaar Card is Proof?’, Ms. Jasmine, Deputy Director, UIDAI, Regional Office, Lucknow has also assisted the Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that although the facts reflected in Para-6 of the petition contain clerical errors, however the case of the petitioners is to the effect that families of petitioners no.1 and 2 (Smt. Parvati Kumari and Virendra Kumar) arranged their marriage. A dispute arose in regard to some demand whereupon parents of Smt. Parvati Kumari petitioner no.1 refused to marry her with petitioner no.2 Virendra Kumar.
On behalf of the petitioners, in context of the accusations of committing offe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.