DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Rattan Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J.—Appellants, hereinafter called as accused persons, in both the appeals are convicts. The principal accused is Rattan Chand, appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 493 of 2015. He has been convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. for the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 404 of the Indian Penal Code, whereas acquitted of the charge framed against him under Section 376 of the Code. His co-accused Vikash Puri, the appellant in connected appeal No. 176 of 2015 has been held guilty and convicted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Accused Rattan Chand has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay Rs.20,000/- as fine for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years for the commission of offence punishable under Section 404 of the Code, whereas accused Vikash Puri has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay Rs.5000/- as fine for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 411 of the Indian Pen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.