SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Murari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Kalyan Roy, Advocate
For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT

Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.—Heard Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 374/2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 3513/2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 175 /379 /414 /420 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 21A 21(6) and 22 of the M.M.D.R., Act, Rule 54 & 4 of the J.M.M.C., Rules.

3. The prosecution case arising out of the First Information Report is that on 08.12.2017 a raiding team was constituted with respect to illegal extraction and transportation of sand and during the course of raid two trucks were apprehended bearing registration nos. BR 01 GC 4796 and JH 02 M 1153, loaded with 1000 CFT of sand each. It has been alleged that on demand no paper could be produced and which ultimately led to institution of Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 374/2017.

4. It has been submitted by Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the owner of the trucks which were under the supervision and custody of the drivers and merely on account of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top