JUDGMENT

N. Anand Venkatesh, J.—This petition has been filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below in CrlMP No.3248 of 2015, allowing the petition filed by the prosecution under Section 311 of CrPC to recall certain witnesses and to mark certain documents.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as A-4 in CC No.187 of 2013. There are totally five accused persons, who are facing trial for the offence under Sections 120(b), 294(b), 467, 468, 471, 420 and 506(ii) of IPC. In this case, the prosecution has completed examination of the witnesses and 313 questioning was also completed. At this stage, a petition was filed by the prosecution under Section 311 of CrPC.

3. In the petition filed before the Court below, the prosecution has submitted that the case involves proving of the charge of forgery and therefore, the Sub Registrar of Vallam, who was examined as PW.6 must be recalled and examined and apart from that the Treasury Officer of Sub Treasury, Thanjavur, which had issued stamp papers also to be examined. That apart, the prosecution wanted to mark two records showing the sale of stamp papers and also delivery of the stamp papers to the same vendor from the Treasury Office. The