Ramdhan Kahra VS State of Chhattisgarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
Ramdhan Kahra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant in Cr.A.No.168/2013:Shri Sumit Singh, Advocate
For the Appellant in Cr.A.No.249/2013:Shri R.K. Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent: Shri Rajendra Tripathi, P.L.

JUDGMENT (CAV)

Gautam Chourdiya, J.—Since both these appeals arise out of the judgment dated 8th February, 2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) in ST No.04/2012, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. By the impugned judgment, each of the accused/appellants stands convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction	Sentence
Under Section 120B/34 of Indian Penal Code.	RI for six months, fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo additional RI for one month.
Under Section 376(g)/34 of Indian Penal Code.	RI for ten years, fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo additional RI for six months.
Under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code.	Life imprisonment, fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default to undergo additional RI for six months.
Under Section 201/34 of Indian Penal Code.	RI for three years, fine of Rs.300/-, in default to undergo additional RI for one month.

All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 24th September, 2011, deceased

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYARamdhan Kahra – AppellantVersusState of Chhattisgarh – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
Ramdhan Kahra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent