SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NUTAN D.SARDESSAI
Manish Karapurkar – Appellant
Versus
Antonio Braganza – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate, S.R. Rivankar, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORDER)

Nutan D. Sardessai, J.—Heard Shri Arun Bras De Sa, learned Advocate for the Petitioners and Shri S.R.Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State/respondent no.3.

2. Rule

3. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

4. Respondent no.2 waives service and Shri S. R. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of respondent no.3.

5. This Writ Petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. takes exception to the order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji dismissing the Revision Application filed by the petitioner dated 03.10.2017 pursuant to which it confirmed the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class issuing summons to the petitioners herein.

6. Heard Shri Arun Bras de Sa learned Advocate for the petitioner who contended at the outset as to how the reportage of the FIR could constitute defamation. He adverted to the press release issued by the Calangute Police Station and submitted that the petitioners had published the said information as given by the Calangute Police and who had subsequently filed a charge sheet against the respondent no.2. He adve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top