SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
C. B. Dhanaram – Appellant
Versus
N. A. Ballur – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sri. P.G. Chikkanaragund, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. S.N. Banakar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pradeep Singh Yerur, J.—This appeal has been preferred by the complainant being aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal passed by the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC at Dharwad in C.C. No.156/2009 dated 15.10.2011, for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as under;

It is the case of appellant that he was well acquainted with respondent and as respondent was in need of financial assistance he approached the complainant for loan amount, to take on lease adjacent hotel and furnish and develop the same near the existing Shree Siddivinayaka Enterprises. The respondent had sought for hand loan of three lakhs on 01.08.2008. Acceding to the request of respondent, appellant paid sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in one lump sum of amount by way of cash to the respondent. It is the case of appellant that respondent had agreed to repay the said amount on 16.08.2008 and accordingly issued a post dated cheque bearing No.0043110 for Rs.3,00,000/- drawn on Malaprabha Gramina Bank, in favour of the appellant.

3. On presentation of the said cheque to his bank, the appellant received an endorsement of dishonor o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top